Saturday, October 5, 2013

Week 2 - Insights to Math and Science


          This week, we examined the juxtaposition of mathematics, art, and science. An interesting insight that I found was that math and science influences art but art can just as easily influence math and science.


          For example, the Mandelbrot set showed me how something as methodical as a simple math equation, Z = z2  + C, can be turned into art. These fractals display patterns in which a detailed representation of itself could be reproduced by “zooming” in. The idea is so systematic; that its aesthetically pleasing patterns create a sense of wonder.


The Mandelbrot Set
Picture found here 


While math can easily become art, art can just as easily become an applicable technological model. Robert Lang explained in his TED talk that origami was once an ancient Japanese paper-folding art form. However, with the advance of technology, computer codes could facilitate the transformation of single pieces of paper to complex artistic structures.


Origami facilitated with the use of mathmatical algorithms.
Screenshot from this video.

The idea of creating a complex structure from a single piece of material could then be utilized in the sciences as far reaching as medical devices to satellites in outer space. Lang transformed art to mathematics, computational algorithms, and a solution to many technological problems. The combination of Lang and Mandelbrot’s creations showed me that artistic and scientific findings do not have to be boxed into their respective worlds, but when the two are allowed to expand – even more amazing creations can be made.

          The Floating Numbers display in the Jewish Museum Berlin, seen herefurther proves that science can enrich art, and vice versa, that art enhances the sciences. In this piece, the artist depicts numbers on a table via a touch-screen tabletop. When touched, the numbers display their greater meaning. 


Floating Numbers Display

This artistic piece tells the story of many scientifically significant numbers, while simultaneously; the technology enhances the experience of the viewers. Floating Numbers is neither distinctly scientific nor distinctly artistic. Imagine the piece without the technological aspect of a touch screen, or imagine a bunch of numbers on a touch screen without the artistic elements of music and design. This piece further emphasizes that the juxtaposition of science and art can be combined into a tool that enhances our creations.


Sources


 1. Alfed, Peter. "The Mandelbrot Set." (1998): n. page. Print. <http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/mandelbrot/>.

2. "Floating Numbers." (2004): n. page. Print. <http://www.artcom.de/en/projects/project/detail/floatingnumbers/>.

3. Lang, Robert, perf. Robert Lang: The math and magic of origami. TED , Film. 5 Oct 2013. <http://www.ted.com/talks/robert_lang_folds_way_new_origami.html>.

4. Lang , Robert. "Science, Mathematics, and Technology." n. page. Print. <http://www.langorigami.com/science/science.php>.

5. Weisstein, Eric W. "Mandelbrot Set." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MandelbrotSet.html

2 comments:

  1. I like your insight of not can only math influence the two cultures, but that art too has a great influence on math and science and your example and picture of Mandelbrot really makes that clear. It truly is a piece of art with some secret math and science stashed in it.
    I agree with your take on the origami video because in some of my computer science courses, I had to create some type of art just by using codes through computer programming. Yet, I feel like being able to create art so easily on the computer kind of takes away something special from the art itself.
    Thank you for sharing the Floating Numbers article! It was so interesting and it really helps clarify the ideas discussed this week.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really enjoyed the examples you used to show how math and art have influenced each other. The origami example you mentioned was especially interesting because it got me thinking about how this artistic push led to revolutions in computer advancement. If computers can fold a single piece of paper into something that can be used in space, there are significant new opportunities that can be accomplished. However, I think at that point, it becomes more scientific than artistic. It's true that the advancement was initially artistically influenced, but then I think it turned into a purely scientific creation. There's nothing wrong with this and if anything I think it supports your point that the artistic and scientific advancements don't have to be boxed into their own worlds.

    ReplyDelete