This week, we examined the juxtaposition of mathematics,
art, and science. An interesting insight that I found was that math and science
influences art but art can just as easily influence math and science.
For example, the Mandelbrot set showed me how something as
methodical as a simple math equation, Z = z2 + C, can be turned into art. These
fractals display patterns in which a detailed representation of itself could be
reproduced by “zooming” in. The idea is so systematic; that its aesthetically
pleasing patterns create a sense of wonder.
The Mandelbrot Set Picture found here |
While math can easily become art,
art can just as easily become an applicable technological model. Robert Lang
explained in his TED talk that origami was once an ancient Japanese
paper-folding art form. However, with the advance of technology, computer codes
could facilitate the transformation of single pieces of paper to complex
artistic structures.
Origami facilitated with the use of mathmatical algorithms. Screenshot from this video. |
The idea of creating a complex
structure from a single piece of material could then be utilized in the
sciences as far reaching as medical devices to satellites in outer space. Lang transformed art to mathematics, computational algorithms, and a solution to many technological problems. The
combination of Lang and Mandelbrot’s creations showed me that artistic and
scientific findings do not have to be boxed into their respective worlds, but
when the two are allowed to expand – even more amazing creations can be made.
The Floating Numbers display in the Jewish Museum Berlin, seen here, further proves that science can
enrich art, and vice versa, that art enhances the sciences. In this piece, the
artist depicts numbers on a table via a touch-screen tabletop. When touched,
the numbers display their greater meaning.
Floating Numbers Display
This artistic piece tells the story
of many scientifically significant numbers, while simultaneously; the technology enhances the experience of the viewers. Floating Numbers is neither distinctly
scientific nor distinctly artistic. Imagine the piece without the technological
aspect of a touch screen, or imagine a bunch of numbers on a touch screen
without the artistic elements of music and design. This piece further
emphasizes that the juxtaposition of science and art can be combined into a
tool that enhances our creations.
Sources
1. Alfed, Peter. "The Mandelbrot Set." (1998): n.
page. Print. <http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/mandelbrot/>.
2. "Floating Numbers." (2004): n. page. Print.
<http://www.artcom.de/en/projects/project/detail/floatingnumbers/>.
3. Lang, Robert, perf. Robert Lang: The math and magic of
origami. TED , Film. 5 Oct 2013. <http://www.ted.com/talks/robert_lang_folds_way_new_origami.html>.
4. Lang , Robert. "Science, Mathematics, and Technology." n. page. Print. <http://www.langorigami.com/science/science.php>.
4. Lang , Robert. "Science, Mathematics, and Technology." n. page. Print. <http://www.langorigami.com/science/science.php>.
5. Weisstein,
Eric W. "Mandelbrot Set." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MandelbrotSet.html
I like your insight of not can only math influence the two cultures, but that art too has a great influence on math and science and your example and picture of Mandelbrot really makes that clear. It truly is a piece of art with some secret math and science stashed in it.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your take on the origami video because in some of my computer science courses, I had to create some type of art just by using codes through computer programming. Yet, I feel like being able to create art so easily on the computer kind of takes away something special from the art itself.
Thank you for sharing the Floating Numbers article! It was so interesting and it really helps clarify the ideas discussed this week.
I really enjoyed the examples you used to show how math and art have influenced each other. The origami example you mentioned was especially interesting because it got me thinking about how this artistic push led to revolutions in computer advancement. If computers can fold a single piece of paper into something that can be used in space, there are significant new opportunities that can be accomplished. However, I think at that point, it becomes more scientific than artistic. It's true that the advancement was initially artistically influenced, but then I think it turned into a purely scientific creation. There's nothing wrong with this and if anything I think it supports your point that the artistic and scientific advancements don't have to be boxed into their own worlds.
ReplyDelete